Alright folks, today I thought I’d actually put two popular players head-to-head: Bob and the AMR player. Everyone’s always arguing about which one’s better, so I grabbed my own stats tracking sheets and decided to settle this myself.
Getting My Hands Dirty
First, I pulled up my old gameplay notebooks – yeah I still scribble stats on paper during matches, sue me. Found records from like 20 sessions for each player. My coffee table looked like a warzone with papers everywhere.
Dug through the mess to pick out four key stats everyone cares about:
- Shots landed per match
- Survival time when cornered
- Distance covered during firefights
- Team assists when things get messy
The Ugly Number Crunching
Sat there with my calculator app like some kind of nerd. Took me three hours just to input numbers into my laptop spreadsheet. Bob’s sheets had coffee stains and the AMR pages were bent – fitting since that guy always makes me sweat during matches.
Ran the numbers three times ’cause I kept second-guessing:
- Bob consistently nailed about 22 shots per match, but AMR player? Dude hit 28 on average. Clear win for AMR there.
- When pinned down though, Bob lasted 15 seconds longer – guess he’s better at finding cover quick.
Where Things Got Interesting
The movement stats shocked me. AMR player covered less ground during fights but positioned smarter. Meanwhile Bob was all over the place like a chicken with its head cut off. No wonder I always burn through stamina playing him.
Biggest surprise? Team assist stats. Bob had way more assists when we were getting swarmed – guess he’s better at watching my back when bullets fly.
My Final Takeaway
Honestly? Neither’s straight up “better.” If I need firepower and sniping? AMR player all day. But when I know the match will get chaotic and I need team support? Bob’s my guy. Stopped caring about “best player” nonsense after seeing these numbers – it’s about which tool fits the job.
Threw my comparison sheets in the drawer after this. Might do sniper rifles next week if anyone cares.
